[Pw_forum] HOMO,LUMO isosurface, USPP or NCPP?
Yavar Taghipour Azar
ytaghipour at aeoi.org.ir
Tue Jul 10 09:01:44 CEST 2012
Dear Eduardo,
thanks for your consideration on my problem,
Bests.
Yavar
-----Original Message-----
From: Eduardo Ariel Menendez Proupin <eariel99 at gmail.com>
To: pw_forum at pwscf.org
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:44:20 +0200
Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] HOMO,LUMO isosurface, USPP or NCPP?
Dear Yavar
USPP and NCPP are mathematical methods to approximate the solution of the
same physical problem. Hence, there must be no physically different results,
unless one of the pseudopotentials is faulty. Both types of pseudopotentials
have cutoff radii, which are larger for NCPP than for USPP. The
wavefunctions computed with any pseudopotential should be equal to the
all-electron wavefunctions in the spatial region outside the spheres
centered at each atom with spheres radii equal to the cutoff radii of the
corresponding pseudopotential. Inside any sphere, the wavefunctions are
different and are meaningless. To have the correct wavefunctions inside the
spheres you have any of the following options a) all-electron calculations
(with a different code,e.g. ADF, Gaussian, LMTO, etc), b) use a PP with a
smaller cutoff radius (and larger ecutrho and ecutwfc), c) use PAW
(projector augmented wave).
sincerely yours
Eduardo Menendez Proupin
Departamento de Química Fisica Aplicada
Facultad de Ciencias
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
28049 Madrid, Spain
Phone: +34 91 497 6706
Dear QE users.
I want to plot HOMO, LUMO isosurfaces. what is the physical origin of
difference between results from choosing USPP with NCPP?
Thanks in advance.
-------------------------------------------
Yavar Taghipour Azar
PhD Student
Physics Group, AEOI
Tehran-Iran
Email: ytaghipour at aeoi.org.ir
Phone: +98 (0) 21 82064556
-----------------------------------------------------------
--
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20120710/69d1a228/attachment.htm
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list