Why do you say " the charge density distribution of system is same "? Shouldn't there be more electons arounding the positive nuclear than far away from the nuclear?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/5/18 mohnish pandey <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mohnish.iitk@gmail.com">mohnish.iitk@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Dear Xcrysden users,<br> I have one trivial question about the isovalue. What exactly isovalue implies, I mean what is the physical interpretation of the isovalue? Because as I think the charge density distribution of system is same so how the value is isovalue is changing the charge density plot?<br>
<br>Thanks in advance,<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Regards,<br>MOHNISH,<br>-----------------------------------------------------------------<br><font color="#888888">Mohnish Pandey<br>Y6927262,4th Year dual degree student,<br>
Department of Chemical Engineering,<br>
IIT KANPUR, UP, INDIA<br>+919235721300<br>-----------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
XCrySDen mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:XCrySDen@democritos.it">XCrySDen@democritos.it</a><br>
<a href="http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/xcrysden" target="_blank">http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/xcrysden</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>陈伟槟<br>Chen Weibing<br>中科院半导体研究所超晶格国家实验室<br>The State Key Laboratory for Superlattices and Microstructures<br>Institute of Semiconductor, Chinese Academy of Science<br>
<br>