Thank you for your advice, Deu. Yes, the non-local energy is independent the spin density. <br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 27 April 2011 12:34, Duy Le <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ttduyle@gmail.com">ttduyle@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">--------------------------------------------------<br>
Duy Le<br>
PhD Student<br>
Department of Physics<br>
University of Central Florida.<br>
<br>
"Men don't need hand to do things"<br>
<div class="im"><br>
<br>
<br>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Stefano de Gironcoli <<a href="mailto:degironc@sissa.it">degironc@sissa.it</a>> wrote:<br>
> Dear WANG Wei<br>
> the vdw-DF functional form is not defined for spin polarized system...<br>
</div>Or it does mean that non-local energy is not spin-dependent but<br>
charge-density-dependent only.<br>
<div class="im">> if you define, implement and test it, you could even get a nice<br>
> publication out of it. thank you.<br>
</div>The spin-polarized vdW-DF has been implemented in GPAW.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">> stefano<br>
><br>
><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br>