<DIV>Dear Eyvaz,</DIV>
<DIV>Thanks a lot for such quick response. I want to know the current method which is just implemented in espresso-4.2.1.</DIV>
<DIV>I guess it may be <A href="http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0504077v2">arXiv:cond-mat/0504077v2</A> with the title "Origins of low- and high-pressure discontinuities of Tc in niobium".</DIV>
<DIV>But I am not very sure about it.</DIV>
<DIV>Best regards,</DIV>
<DIV>Xiang-Feng Zhou</DIV>
<DIV>Nankai University</DIV>
<DIV><BR>>Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] Reference of example07 (version 4.2.1)<BR>>To: PWSCF Forum <pw_forum@pwscf.org><BR>>Message-ID: <642054.81981.qm@web65713.mail.ac4.yahoo.com><BR>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<BR>><BR>>Hi, <BR>><BR>>>From: Xiang-FengZhou <zxf888@163.com><BR>> <BR>>>which will be the best reference for the example07 (electron-phonon calculation) <BR>>>within the >version of 4.1 or 4.2.1 ?<BR>>If you mean which one 4.1 or 4.2.1 is better for \lambda calculations, you can <BR>>use both, in my experience I do not see any difference between them. <BR>><BR>><BR>>You can try CVS version which should give additional information (lambda.out) <BR>>with \lambda and T_c). Hopefully it contains changes I have made in July. <BR>><BR>><BR>>Bests,<BR>>Eyvaz.<BR>> -------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>>Prof. Eyvaz Isaev, <BR>>Department of Physics, Chemistry, and Biology (IFM), Linkoping University, <BR>>Sweden <BR>><BR>>Theoretical Physics Department, Moscow State Institute of Steel & Alloys, <BR>>Russia, <BR>><BR>>isaev@ifm.liu.se, <A href="mailto:eyvaz_isaev@yahoo.com">eyvaz_isaev@yahoo.com</A></DIV><br><br><span title="neteasefooter"><span id="netease_mail_footer"></span></span>