I got it Davide. You mean conversion from angstrom to Bohr radius close to 0.53 Angstrom.<br>So, there is no other problem except this that you noticed.<br><br>Thank you very much again.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Davide Ceresoli <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ceresoli@mit.edu">ceresoli@mit.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">Davide Ceresoli wrote:<br>
> (1.8897261 = 1/0.052917721).<br>
</div>I meant: (1.8897261 = 1/0.52917721).<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Pw_forum mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Pw_forum@pwscf.org">Pw_forum@pwscf.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum" target="_blank">http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>