[Pw_forum] pwscf: constrained total magnetic moment
Gabriele Sclauzero
gabriele.sclauzero at epfl.ch
Thu Jan 5 11:50:50 CET 2012
Dear German,
have you checked the manuals? In the input description of PWscf I've found:
'total':
total magnetization is constrained by
adding a penalty functional to the total energy:
LAMBDA * SUM_{i} ( magnetization(i) - fixed_magnetization(i) )**2
where the sum over i runs over the three components of
the magnetization. Lambda is a real number (see below).
Noncolinear case only. Use "tot_magnetization" for LSDA
I think that, in order to fix the total magnetization in LSDA calculations (nspin=2), you should simply set the tot_magnetization parameter (two-Fermi-energies method) and not specify the constrained_magnetization keyword. Which version of QE are you using?
HTH
GS
Il giorno 03/gen/2012, alle ore 20.10, German Samolyuk ha scritto:
> Dear all,
>
> I do self-consistent calculation of supercell with 135 Fe atoms with
> constrained magnetization.
>
> nspin = 2,
> fixed_magnetization(3) = 360.0,
> constrained_magnetization = 'total' ,
>
> The output value of magnetic field:
>
> Magnetic field = 0.0785401 Ry
>
>
> In order to make a rough estimation of corresponding magnetic field in
> Tesla I should divide this value by mu_B and difference between
> total magnetic moments of system with constrain and without it?
>
> Thank you
>
> German Samolyuk
> Oak Rigde National Laboratory
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
§ Gabriele Sclauzero, EPFL SB ITP CSEA
PH H2 462, Station 3, CH-1015 Lausanne
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20120105/11518fc4/attachment.htm
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list