[Pw_forum] problem in vc-relax
vkarthik
vkarthik at MIT.EDU
Tue Oct 4 18:11:11 CEST 2011
ATOMIC_POSITIONS {crystal}
C 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mo 0.3333333 0.666666 0.25
Mo 0.6666666 0.333333 0.75
This will work for hexagonal system.
Quoting "Arles V. Gil Rebaza" <arvifis at gmail.com>:
> Hi Ashish Kumar, if you don't know: vc-relax means variable-cell relax. So,
> you're doing this kind of calculation, where the default is relax all cell
> parameters ( axis, angles, position). You can choose which parameters are
> fixed or which parameters are relaxed, please read the QE manual, the
> section &CELL , the variable "cell_dofree"
>
> Best.
>
> PhD stud Arles V. Gil Rebaza
> IFLP - Argentina
>
> 2011/10/4 Ashish Kumar <ashishespresso at gmail.com>
>
>> Hello to all,
>>
>> I have tried for the vc-relax of Mo2C hexagonal system, job is not done
>> properly it come out in between and the atomic positions
>>
>> what I have given in the input file and what I am getting in the out file
>> is different.
>> (i) Why the crystal positions changes. what I think that the nature of the
>> atomic postions must be retained.
>>
>> In Input file
>> ATOMIC_POSITIONS (alat)
>> C 0.00 0.00 0.00
>> Mo 0.3333333 0.666666 0.25
>> Mo 0.6666666 0.333333 0.75
>>
>>
>>
>> In out file we get
>>
>> CELL_PARAMETERS (alat= 5.67296009)
>> 0.946518633 0.001215132 -0.004855406
>> -0.474470641 0.819090796 -0.000958606
>> 0.009278926 0.007480907 1.741942673
>>
>> ATOMIC_POSITIONS (alat)
>> C 0.156590059 0.041446237 -0.212516996
>> Mo 0.157761886 0.589915381 0.269109338
>> Mo 0.636664528 0.321113609 1.041609035
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> (ii) why cell_parameter changes in the out file . (I think that for
>> hexagonal system it must be what given in the input file)
>>
>>
>> my input file
>>
>> &control
>> calculation='vc-relax'
>> restart_mode='from_scratch',
>> pseudo_dir = '/home/ashish/softwares/espresso/pseudo/',
>> outdir='/home/ashish/dft/espresso_mo2c/test1/tmp_espresso/'
>> prefix='mo2c'
>> tprnfor = .true.,
>> tstress = .true.
>> /
>> &system
>> ibrav=4, celldm(1) =5.672960087 , celldm(3)=1.573617588 , nat=3,
>> ntyp=2,
>> nspin = 1, starting_magnetization(1)=0.7,
>> ecutwfc = 24.0, ecutrho = 288.0,
>> occupations='smearing', smearing='methfessel-paxton', degauss=0.02
>> /
>> &electrons
>> diagonalization='cg'
>> conv_thr = 1.0e-8
>> mixing_beta = 0.7
>> /
>> &ions
>> ion_dynamics='bfgs'
>> /
>> &cell
>> cell_dynamics='bfgs'
>> /
>> ATOMIC_SPECIES {crystal}
>> C 12.01 C.pw91-van_ak.UPF
>> Mo 95.94 Mo.pw91-n-van.UPF
>> ATOMIC_POSITIONS
>> C 0.0 0.0 0.0
>> Mo 1/3 2/3 1/4
>> Mo 2/3 1/3 3/4
>>
>> K_POINTS automatic
>> 4 4 4 0 0 0
>>
>>
>> can any one help me. What is the mistake (in my input file or else)
>>
>>
>> with best wishes
>> Ashish
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pw_forum mailing list
>> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
>> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ###---------> Arles V. <---------###
>
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list