[Pw_forum] Problem to run GIPAW
Ronaldo Giro
rndgiro at ig.com.br
Fri Apr 1 14:08:58 CEST 2011
Dear all
I tried to run GIPAW module to calculate the nmr chemical shift and epr
parameter but I had some problems:
If a tried to calculate 'efg' - electrical field gradient, everything goes
fine.
But if I tried other options like 'nmr', 'g_tensor', 'f_sum' I got the
following error:
This program is part of the open-source Quantum ESPRESSO suite
for quantum simulation of materials; please acknowledge
"P. Giannozzi et al., J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 21 395502 (2009);
URL http://www.quantum-espresso.org",
in publications or presentations arising from this work. More details
at
http://www.quantum-espresso.org/wiki/index.php/Citing_Quantum-ESPRESSO
Parallel version (MPI), running on 4 processors
R & G space division: proc/pool = 4
Planes per process (thick) : nr3 = 30 npp = 8 ncplane = 900
Proc/ planes cols G planes cols G columns G
Pool (dense grid) (smooth grid) (wavefct grid)
1 8 160 3014 8 160 3014 48 526
2 8 159 3013 8 159 3013 48 526
3 7 161 3013 7 161 3013 49 527
4 7 161 3013 7 161 3013 48 524
tot 30 641 12053 30 641 12053 193 2103
init_gipaw_1: projectors nearly linearly dependent:
ntyp = 1, l/n1/n2 = 0 2 1 -0.99707079
init_gipaw_1: projectors nearly linearly dependent:
ntyp = 2, l/n1/n2 = 1 2 1 -0.99430547
init_gipaw_1: projectors nearly linearly dependent:
ntyp = 3, l/n1/n2 = 1 2 1 -0.99382826
NMR: species H, no information on the core
NMR: species C, contribution to shift due to core = 200.333
NMR: species O, contribution to shift due to core = 270.669
GIPAW : 0.30s CPU time, 0.35s WALL time
WARNING: rho_diff zero!
Computing the magnetic susceptibilityrank 3 in job 30 admin_51775
caused collective abort of all ranks
exit status of rank 3: killed by signal 11
rank 1 in job 30 admin_51775 caused collective abort of all ranks
exit status of rank 1: killed by signal 11
It looks like threre is a problem in the routine to compute the magnetic
susceptibility, which
is a common routine to both calculations. How can I solve this problem?
Another question: Is possible to calculate the hyperfine tensor with the
option 'hyperfine'?
I look at the main routine of GIPAW and i found that, authought this option
is implemented,
I did not find the subroutine hyperfine.
Best regards,
Ronaldo Giro
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20110401/92b65b84/attachment.htm
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list