[Pw_forum] Total magnetization and local magnetic moment
Gabriele Sclauzero
sclauzer at sissa.it
Mon Jul 5 12:43:52 CEST 2010
On 07/05/2010 12:05 PM, Padmaja Patnaik wrote:
> I have proceeded with the supercell which is giving correct DOS. Here
> is the value of total magnetizatin from the scf.out file without
> relaxation.
>
> ! total energy = -1494.09037638 Ry
> Harris-Foulkes estimate = -1494.09037639 Ry
> estimated scf accuracy < 6.7E-09 Ry
>
> The total energy is the sum of the following terms:
>
> one-electron contribution = 257.19918198 Ry
> hartree contribution = 202.08158140 Ry
> xc contribution = -548.49776710 Ry
> ewald contribution = -1404.85946098 Ry
> smearing contrib. (-TS) = -0.01391169 Ry
>
> total magnetization = 1.02 Bohr mag/cell
> absolute magnetization = 1.12 Bohr mag/cell
>
> convergence has been achieved in 17 iterations
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Here is the portion of the file *.pdos.out without relaxation
>
> Atom # 1: total charge = 14.3653, s = 2.4622, p = 6.8403, d =
> 5.0628,
> spin up = 7.7466, s = 1.2349, p = 3.4229, d
> = 3.0889,
> spin down = 6.6187, s = 1.2274, p = 3.4174, d
> = 1.9739,
> polarization = 1.1279, s = 0.0075, p = 0.0054, d
> = 1.1150,
> Atom # 2: total charge = 2.9244, s = 0.8587, p = 2.0656, d
> = 0.0000,
> spin up = 1.4798, s = 0.4351, p = 1.0446, d
> = 0.0000,
> spin down = 1.4446, s = 0.4236, p = 1.0210, d
> = 0.0000,
> polarization = 0.0352, s = 0.0115, p = 0.0236, d
> = 0.0000,
> Atom # 3: total charge = 2.9244, s = 0.8587, p = 2.0656, d
> = 0.0000,
> spin up = 1.4798, s = 0.4351, p = 1.0446, d
> = 0.0000,
> spin down = 1.4446, s = 0.4236, p = 1.0210, d
> = 0.0000,
> polarization = 0.0352, s = 0.0115, p = 0.0236, d
> = 0.0000,
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> As you can see atom number 1(this is the impurity) is showing a local
> magnetic moment. Now, below i add portions of the same two files from
> with relaxation calculations.
> ! total energy = -1494.15610974 Ry
> Harris-Foulkes estimate = -1494.15610974 Ry
> estimated scf accuracy < 1.9E-10 Ry
>
> The total energy is the sum of the following terms:
>
> one-electron contribution = 270.52901167 Ry
> hartree contribution = 195.52169853 Ry
> xc contribution = -548.43270406 Ry
> ewald contribution = -1411.76028316 Ry
> smearing contrib. (-TS) = -0.01383273 Ry
>
> total magnetization = 1.13 Bohr mag/cell
> absolute magnetization = 1.26 Bohr mag/cell
>
> convergence has been achieved in 9 iterations
>
>
It looks like your impurity (Ge, I guess) acquires a lot of charge upon
relaxing the structure, so that the d electrons get filled and you lose
the local moment. This may be a real description or some spurious effect
due to orbitals overlap (though it's unlikely if these are very
localized 3d electrons).
About the total magnetization, well I don't know. It may come from
neighboring atoms if they have donated some charge to the impurity.
HTH
GS
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Atom # 1: total charge = 19.3947, s = 2.5253, p = 7.6414, d =
> 9.2280,
> spin up = 9.7222, s = 1.2688, p = 3.8289, d
> = 4.6245,
> spin down = 9.6725, s = 1.2566, p = 3.8125, d
> = 4.6035,
> polarization = 0.0496, s = 0.0122, p = 0.0164, d
> = 0.0210,
> Atom # 2: total charge = 3.0599, s = 0.9045, p = 2.1555, d
> = 0.0000,
> spin up = 1.5315, s = 0.4527, p = 1.0787, d
> = 0.0000,
> spin down = 1.5285, s = 0.4517, p = 1.0767, d
> = 0.0000,
> polarization = 0.0030, s = 0.0010, p = 0.0020, d
> = 0.0000,
> Atom # 3: total charge = 3.0599, s = 0.9045, p = 2.1555, d
> = 0.0000,
> spin up = 1.5315, s = 0.4527, p = 1.0787, d
> = 0.0000,
> spin down = 1.5285, s = 0.4517, p = 1.0767, d
> = 0.0000,
> polarization = 0.0030, s = 0.0010, p = 0.0020, d
> = 0.0000,
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Here as you can see the total magnetization increases but the atom
> number 1 (impurity) is showing zero local magnetic moment.
> I hope i made the problem more clear this time.
>
> Regards
>
--
Gabriele Sclauzero, EPFL SB ITP CSEA
PH H2 462, Station 3, CH-1015 Lausanne
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20100705/f9d2e088/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list