[Pw_forum] Bilayer graphene subject to an electric field
Eyvaz Isaev
eyvaz_isaev at yahoo.com
Tue Dec 14 22:40:59 CET 2010
Hi,
A couple of comments that might be useful.
1. As you use an US pseudopotential, reduce ecutwfc down to ~30Ry. I do not see
any reason for such kind of high cutoff energy, unless you performed some tests
and proved that 60Ry is better. Besides, for the same reason (US PsP), you
should use more ecutrho (8-12 times of ecutwfc). By default ecutrho=4*ecutwfc
(why so, think about) and this works for norm-conserving PsPs.
As a reference see N.Mounet and N. Marzari, Phys. Rev. B 71, 205214 (2005),
where they used ecutoff=40Ry for graphene and other C-based structures.
2. I have noticed that the job started to converge when I used smaller
efield_cart(3)=0.05, after 49 iteration I had
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00007068 Ry
but then my notebook turned off due to a heating problem, I suggest. As I just
tried to test the problem I used only 2x2x1 k-points set, and
mixing_beta(1)=0.05.
But when I used efield_cart(3)=0.005 (with mixing coefficient 0.1) the job
finished after 11 iterations.
Hope this helps.
Bests,
Eyvaz.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Prof. Eyvaz Isaev,
Department of Physics, Chemistry, and Biology (IFM), Linkoping University,
Sweden
Theoretical Physics Department, Moscow State Institute of Steel & Alloys,
Russia,
isaev at ifm.liu.se, eyvaz_isaev at yahoo.com
________________________________
From: Elie Moujaes <elie.moujaes at hotmail.co.uk>
To: pw_forum at pwscf.org
Sent: Mon, December 13, 2010 1:57:36 PM
Subject: [Pw_forum] Bilayer graphene subject to an electric field
Dear all,
I am trying to get the band structure of bilayer graphene under the effect of an
external electric field. I have done the scf calculations without the inclusion
of an electric field , then again did teh scf calculation with an electric field
included in the z-direction (of value 0.1 Ry). However the convergence is not
achieved and it stopped after 100 iterations giving the following message:
total cpu time spent up to now is 83435.11 secs
total energy = -52.83248336 Ry
Harris-Foulkes estimate = -45.80937450 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00524127 Ry
End of self-consistent calculation
convergence NOT achieved after 100 iterations: stopping
You will find below the inout file for the scf calculation when an electric
field is applied:
&control
prefix='bielgraphene',
calculation='scf',
restart_mode='from_scratch',
lelfield = .true.,
nberrycyc= 1,
pseudo_dir = '/espresso-4.2/pseudo/',
outdir='/tmp/results_MOUJAES/'
/
&system
ibrav= 4, celldm(1) =4.608737, celldm(3)=5.330410, nat=4, ntyp= 1,
ecutwfc = 60.D0,occupations='smearing',smearing='methfessel-paxton',
degauss=0.01
/
&electrons
conv_thr=1.D-5,
mixing_mode='local-TF'
mixing_beta=0.1D0
efield_cart(1) = 0.000,
efield_cart(2) = 0.000,
efield_cart(3) = 0.10,
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
C 12.0107 C.pz-rrkjus.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
C 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
C 0.000000 0.000000 0.257692
C 0.333333 -0.33333 0.000000
C -0.333333 0.33333 0.257692
K_POINTS automatic
25 25 1 0 0 0
Thanks
Elie Moujaes
University of Nottingham
NG7 2RD
UK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20101214/5b9bc55e/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list