[Pw_forum] iotk error - again

[W2AGZ]

While trying to run an electron-phonon calculation (PH) on my Ubuntu 8.04
box within QE 4.0 (a very stable configuration), I get the following
immediately after start-up:

############################################################################
############################################

# FROM IOTK LIBRARY, VERSION 1.1.0development

# UNRECOVERABLE ERROR (ierr=1)

# ERROR IN: iotk_scan_end (iotk_scan.spp:211)

# CVS Revision: 1.7

# foundl

# ERROR IN: iotk_close_read (iotk_files.spp:589)

# CVS Revision: 1.3

I've run at least four or five other e-p sessions on the above box without
problem.  If helpful, I can post my input file later.

 

Drilling around the Forum, I found this:

*************************************************************************

alan chen chenhanghuipwscf at gmail.com

Wed Aug 13 23:33:56 CEST 2008

Previous message: [Pw_forum] npwx in pwscf v.4.0

Next message: [Pw_forum] IOTK library

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Dear PWSCF users,

      I have encountered this problem many times and I checked the archive

but I still did not get how to fix the problem. Some of my jobs are killed

by the following errors:

 

############################################################################
############################################

# FROM IOTK LIBRARY, VERSION 1.1.0development

# UNRECOVERABLE ERROR (ierr=1)

# ERROR IN: iotk_getline (iotk_scan.spp:812)

# CVS Revision: 1.7

#

iostat=-1

# ERROR IN: iotk_scan_tag (iotk_scan.spp:516)

# CVS Revision: 1.7

# ERROR IN: iotk_scan (iotk_scan.spp:710)

# CVS Revision: 1.7

# ERROR IN: iotk_scan_end (iotk_scan.spp:211)

# CVS Revision: 1.7

# foundl

# ERROR IN: iotk_close_read (iotk_files.spp:589)

# CVS Revision: 1.3

############################################################################
############################################

 

Paolo suggested a quick fix: change Q_REAL in Q_REAL_SPACE in

Modules/xml_io_base.f90 (thanks to Giovanni Bussi).

Does that mean: replace Q_REAL_SPACE by Q_REAL?  Could any one provide more

specific procedures to fix the bug?

Thank you very much.

 

Hanghui Chen

Department of Physics,

Yale University

-------------- next part --------------

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

URL:
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20080813/d86fccae/at
tachment.htm           

 

PMG Comment:  Paolo responded "replace q_real by q_real_space."  Is this the
fix?

Paul Grant, IBM Research Staff Member Emeritus

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20101206/d6a7baf7/attachment.htm