[Pw_forum] the best choice for k-point
Hanyu
ouuing at gmail.com
Wed Aug 18 10:12:26 CEST 2010
I think (1 1 8) converged very well.
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Farzad Molani <farzad_c81 at yahoo.com>wrote:
> hello QE users,
> I'm going to achieve the best kpoint and cut-off for my system. I got
> results but I do'nt know, What is the best choice for K-point?
> please help me,
> thanks in advance.?
> energy(Ry) k-point
> -270.57530321 1 1 3
> -270.58540932 1 1 4
> -270.58749209 1 1 5
> -270.58517276 1 1 6
> -270.58547581 1 1 7
> -270.58556388 1 1 8
> -270.58553867 1 1 9
> -270.58554333 1 1 10
>
> Farzad Molani,
> Ph.D Student,
> Department of Theoretical Physical Chemistry,
> K. N. Toosi University of Technology,
> Tehran, Iran.
> Tel.: 009891 4442 3308
> Tel.: 009821 2306 4280
> Fax: 009821 2285 3650
> Web: http://www.chem.kntu.ac.ir/~sjalili:/<http://www.chem.kntu.ac.ir/%7Esjalili:/>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
>
--
-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=**=-=**=-=**=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-
Hanyu Liu(刘寒雨),
State key Laboratory of Superhard Materials, Jilin University, China
Email: liuhanyu08 at mails.jlu.edu.cn or ouuing at gmail.com
skype: ouuing
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20100818/fe3ec9c4/attachment.htm
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list