[Pw_forum] scf calculation of isolated atom
udayagiri sai babu
udayagiri3 at gmail.com
Wed Oct 7 09:19:17 CEST 2009
Thank you for the answer GS and Lorenzo. I am using 10 occupations per line
in the occupations card as you suggested and It is not giving any error now.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Lorenzo Paulatto <paulatto at sissa.it> wrote:
> In data 06 ottobre 2009 alle ore 11:34:33, udayagiri sai babu
> <udayagiri3 at gmail.com> ha scritto:
> > I got an error saying *"strange occupations:number of electrons from
> > occupations is wrong"*. I undestood like my occupation card is not
> > matching with my "nbnd" value but i could not correct it can somebody
> > give me some
> > suggestion.
>
> In QE versions 4.0.x and before the occupations you had to specify at most
> ten occupations per line, you input would work this way:
>
> OCCUPATIONS
> 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
> 0 0 0
> 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
> 0 0 0
>
> QE 4.1 and newer do not have this limitation.
>
> best regards
>
>
>
> --
> Lorenzo Paulatto
> SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
> phone: +39 040 3787 511
> skype: paulatz
> www: http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/<http://people.sissa.it/%7Epaulatto/>
>
> *** save italian brains ***
> http://saveitalianbrains.wordpress.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
--
U.Saibabu
PhD student,
Deformation mechanisms modeling group,
Materials engineering department,
IISc Bangalore,
India.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20091007/8de40c7c/attachment.htm
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list