[Pw_forum] SCF correction problem in relaxation
Jhon W. González
jwgonzal2 at yahoo.es
Sat May 30 11:21:09 CEST 2009
Hi,
I'm trying to relax a cell to calculate transport properties of zigzag
graphene nanoribbon, but there is something wrong, because for all
parameters, always get the same final result
SCF correction compared to forces is too large, reduce conv_thr
This message appears for all conv_thr parameters (From 1.0D-6 to 1.0D-1)
Thanks a lot,
##########################
&CONTROL
... etot_conv_thr = 1.0D-4 ,
forc_conv_thr = 1.0D-3 ,
/
&SYSTEM
... occupations = 'smearing' ,
degauss = 0.01 ,
smearing = 'fermi-dirac' ,
/
&ELECTRONS
electron_maxstep = 100,
conv_thr = 1.0D-5 ,
/
&IONS
/
##############################
Produces an output like:
Total force = 0.001237 Total SCF correction = 0.000289
SCF correction compared to forces is too large, reduce conv_thr
bfgs converged in 11 scf cycles and 8 bfgs steps
End of BFGS Geometry Optimization
############################
&ELECTRONS
diagonalization = 'cg',
mixing_mode = 'plain',
mixing_beta = 0.7,
conv_thr = 1.D-6,
mixing_beta = 0.3D0,
/
&IONS
ion_dynamics='bfgs'
bfgs_ndim = 1,
pot_extrapolation = "second_order",
wfc_extrapolation = "second_order",
/
#############################
Also produce the same warning
SCF correction compared to forces is too large, reduce conv_thr
Jhon W. González
Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María
Fono (56) (32) 2654623 Fax (56) (32) 2797656
Casilla 110-VALPARAISO
Avenida España 1680
239-0123 VALPARAISO
CHILE
for QE forum: http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list