[Pw_forum] US j -average not yet implemented
e kb
eminekb at yahoo.com
Mon Mar 16 08:25:20 CET 2009
Dear AKS,
If I got it correctly, the code uses the fully relativistic pseudopotential as a scalar rel. one if a non collinear calculation is not asked for. This is done in average_pp.f90 it seems, where you get the error which tells you the problem: j-average is not implemented for ultrasoft pseudopotentials. I might be wrong though, this is just the info that i got by 'grep'ping twice.
Cheers,
Emine kucukbenli, PhD student, SISSA, Italy.
--- On Mon, 3/16/09, artee sharma <mailtoartee at gmail.com> wrote:
From: artee sharma <mailtoartee at gmail.com>
Subject: [Pw_forum] US j -average not yet implemented
To: pw_forum at pwscf.org
Date: Monday, March 16, 2009,
5:43 AM
Dear all,
I have an input like shown below:
&control
calculation='relax',
pseudo_dir = '',
outdir='',
tstress = .true.
tprnfor = .true.
prefix=''
wf_collect= .true. ,
/
&system
ibrav=0,
nat= 95,
ntyp=3,
ecutwfc = 30.0,
ecutrho = 180.0,
occupations='smearing',
smearing='methfessel-paxton',
degauss=0.003,
nbnd=400,
/
&electrons
conv_thr = 1.0e-6,
mixing_beta = 0.1,
/
&ions
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Pt 195.09 Ptrel.RRKJ3.UPF
Ce 140.116 Ce_lda_sc.UPF
O 16.00 O.pz-rrkjus.UPF
CELL_PARAMETERS
20.4500 0.0000 0.0000
0.00000 20.4500 0.0000
0.00000 0.0000 20.4500
ATOMIC_POSITIONS (crystal)
Ce 0.10000 0.05000 0.02000
Ce 0.25500 0.21000 0.02000
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
O 0.37500 0.61500 0.37500
O 0.62500 0.37500 0.39500
O 0.37500 0.32500 0.37500
K_POINTS {automatic}
4 4 4 0 0 0
But its showing error which says "US j -average not yet implemented". What does it mean?? does it has something to do with the pseudo file of Pt (Ptrel.RRKJ3.UPF)??
thanks in advance
A K S
_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum at pwscf.org
http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20090316/2a9bfa1e/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list