[Pw_forum] doubt about documentation of QE
Paolo Giannozzi
giannozz at democritos.it
Mon Jun 15 12:50:27 CEST 2009
On Jun 15, 2009, at 11:19 , shypirate wrote:
> For example, in example30/README, 'tefield' and 'efield' is used
> together
> to add electric field to the studied system. However, in the
> 'INPUT_PW.html',
> 'tefield' is used to specified a sawlike potential, and 'efield' is
> used if
> 'lelfield=.TRUE.', at the same time, 'lelfield' is "different" from
> 'tefield'.
> [...] Any suggestion is appreciated!
you will have better luck if you read the documentation for CP:
Doc/INPUT_CP, since this is what is actually used in example30.
Unfortunately there is a mismatch between CP and PWscf in the
definition of electric fields
P.
---
Paolo Giannozzi, Dept of Physics, University of Udine
via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list