[Pw_forum] failure with NCPP
lan haiping
lanhaiping at gmail.com
Mon Jul 20 17:22:35 CEST 2009
Dear Eric,
I tried fhi2upf, it works fine after i stripped off the param file at the
end.
I still a problem . In opium, the configuration for PP generation only
pseudos 3 shells , i.e. , 4s/4p/3d, while fhi2upf inquire me to set 4
shells . What should i deal with this situation ?
Best wishes,
Hai-Ping
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Eric J. Walter <ejwalt at wm.edu> wrote:
>
> Ian,
>
> Does fhi2upf work if you start with the fhi output and strip off the
> param file at the end?
>
> I can try this myself later.
>
> Eric
>
>
>
>
>
>
> lan haiping wrote:
> > Dear Paolo,
> > Thanks .
> > I then check input settings for opium , and find the wavefunctions
> > are already arranged by increasing 'l'.
> > The setting for Zn pseudopotential is following:
> > "
> > [Atom]
> > Zn
> > 8 # norb: number of orbitals
> > 100 2.00 - # nlm occ eigen(- means auto-generate)
> > 200 2.00 -
> > 210 6.00 -
> > 300 2.00 -
> > 310 6.00 -
> > 400 1.50 -
> > 410 0.00 -
> > 320 10.00 -
> >
> > [Pseudo]
> > 3 1.87 1.85 1.97
> > opt
> >
> > [Optinfo]
> > 7.07 10
> > 7.07 10
> > 7.07 10
> > [XC]
> > gga # lda[PZ] or gga[PBE]
> >
> > [KBdesign]
> > 0 # local orb
> > 1 # number of aug. operators
> > au 0.1 1.60 -3.05 # unit(gp or au) left right height(Ry)
> > [Loginfo]
> > 0
> > 2.0 -4.0 4.0
> > "
> > and for O is
> > "
> > [Atom]
> > O
> > 3
> > 100 2.00 -
> > 200 2.00 -
> > 210 4.00 -
> > [Pseudo]
> > 2 1.34 1.53
> > opt
> > [Optinfo]
> > 7.07 10
> > 7.07 10
> > conmax
> > [XC]
> > gga
> > "
> >
> > I donot know why these PP cannot be read by pw.x .
> > By the way, is there any simple method to use opium's settings in
> > ld1.x ?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Hai-Ping
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Paolo Giannozzi
> > <giannozz at democritos.it <mailto:giannozz at democritos.it>> wrote:
> >
> > lan haiping wrote:
> >
> > > I wonder whether QE still support NCPP format
> >
> > it does, otherwise it would have issued a different message
> >
> > > or other special consideration needs to take into for opium's pp ?
> >
> > atomic wavefunctions should be in order of increasing l.
> > Not sure why this is needed and whethere it is really needed.
> >
> > P.
> > --
> > Paolo Giannozzi, Democritos and University of Udine, Italy
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pw_forum mailing list
> > Pw_forum at pwscf.org <mailto:Pw_forum at pwscf.org>
> > http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Hai-Ping Lan
> > Department of Electronics ,
> > Peking University , Bejing, 100871
> > lanhaiping at gmail.com <mailto:lanhaiping at gmail.com>, hplan at pku.edu.cn
> > <mailto:hplan at pku.edu.cn>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pw_forum mailing list
> > Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> > http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
--
Hai-Ping Lan
Department of Electronics ,
Peking University , Bejing, 100871
lanhaiping at gmail.com, hplan at pku.edu.cn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20090720/5b686524/attachment.htm
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list