[Pw_forum] DOS of graphene
meisam aghtar
meisam_a84 at yahoo.com
Sun Jul 13 15:14:00 CEST 2008
Dear Miguel & Paolo
This time I used the smearing occupation instead of tetrahedral method using a dense meshed BZ. The result is better , for example there is not any gap but that still does not seem to be the exact DOS. Blow are my scf and nscf inputs.
Of course according to Paolo’s response I have not tested the 4.0.1 version. I don’t know if that one makes a better result.
/
&SYSTEM
ibrav = 4,
celldm(1) = 4.647779861,
celldm(3) = 8,
nat = 2,
ntyp = 1,
ecutwfc = 40 ,
/
&ELECTRONS
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
C 12.01070 C.pz-vbc.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS angstrom
C 0.000000000 1.420000000 0.000000000
C 1.229756073 0.710000000 0.000000000
K_POINTS automatic
10 10 1 1 1 1
Nscf :
/
&SYSTEM
ibrav = 4,
celldm(1) = 4.647779861,
celldm(3) = 8,
nat = 2,
ntyp = 1,
ecutwfc = 40 ,
nosym = .true. ,
occupations = 'smearing' ,
degauss = 0.05 ,
smearing = 'methfessel-paxton' ,
/
&ELECTRONS
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
C 12.01070 C.pz-vbc.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
C 0.000000000 1.420000000 0.000000000
C 1.229756073 0.710000000 0.000000000
K_POINTS tpiba
301
M. Aghtar
M.sc student
Physics department of Kashan university
_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum at pwscf.org
http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20080713/49710b4d/attachment.htm
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list