[Pw_forum] the problem of scf convergence
Stefano Baroni
baroni at sissa.it
Thu Sep 13 08:50:37 CEST 2007
Dear unnamed friend:
system? input file? name? affiliation?
thanks - Stefano Baroni
On Sep 13, 2007, at 6:23 AM, hyello25 Qgrui wrote:
> hello, everyone.
> These days, I performed the convergence of scf calculation with
> some USPP, but never see a good ecut convergence. The system only
> contains 3 atoms, with 12x12x12 kpoints automatic generated in MP
> grids.
> Why does the press differ each so mush? Is 200ev Ry too high for
> USPP? And which press is more convictional?
> Can anyone give me some suggestion? Thanks in advance.
> ecut=80 :
> ! total energy = -61.89999202 Ry
> total stress (Ry/bohr**3) (kbar)
> P= 0.59
> ecut=100 :
> ! total energy = -61.90651146 Ry
> total stress (Ry/bohr**3) (kbar)
> P= -5.39
> ecut=140 :
> ! total energy = -61.90331161 Ry
> total stress (Ry/bo hr**3)
> (kbar) P= 0.97
> ecut=180 :
> ! total energy = -61.90482904 Ry
> total stress (Ry/bohr**3) (kbar)
> P= 10.64
> ecut=200 :
> ! total energy = -61.90542701 Ry
> total stress (Ry/bohr**3) (kbar)
> P= -4.55
> ecut=240 :
> ! total energy = -61.90875043 Ry
> total stress (Ry/bohr**3) (kbar)
> P= 5.92
> ecut=280 :
> ! total energy = -61.90854533 Ry
> total stress (Ry/bohr**3) (kbar)
> P= 1.68
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
---
Stefano Baroni - SISSA & DEMOCRITOS National Simulation Center -
Trieste
[+39] 040 3787 406 (tel) -528 (fax) / stefanobaroni (skype)
Please, if possible, don't send me MS Word or PowerPoint attachments
Why? See: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20070913/09df9107/attachment.htm
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list