[Pw_forum] About "crystal" coordinates
Sandro Scandolo
scandolo at ictp.it
Tue Sep 4 13:51:45 CEST 2007
For the sake of clarity (and for the benefit of our colleagues
crystallographers), let me rephrase the original reply to this thread:
When using PWSCF with non-primitive lattices, "crystal" coordinates
refer to the primitive cell, not to the conventional cell (the latter
being the common practice in crystallography).
Sandro
Alexander Shaposhnikov wrote:
> Hello Tone,
>
> sorry for delay -i was out from my institution for several days.
> The patch you sent is working, the structure is displayed correctly now. Here
> is the sample input with structure.
>
> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////
> &CONTROL
> title = Ta2O5 ,
> calculation = 'scf' ,
> restart_mode = 'from_scratch' ,
> outdir = '/home/alex/scr/mono_bc' ,
> pseudo_dir = '/home/alex/pseudo/' ,
> prefix = Ta2O5mbc ,
> disk_io = 'default' ,
> verbosity = 'high' ,
> /
> &SYSTEM
> ibrav = 13,
> celldm(1) = 24.16,
> celldm(2) = 0.43,
> celldm(3) = 0.38,
> celldm(4) = -0.246,
> nat = 14,
> ntyp = 2,
> ecutwfc = 55 ,
> /
> &ELECTRONS
> diagonalization = 'david' ,
> /
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
> Ta 1.00000 Ta.pbe-nsp-van.UPF
> O 1.00000 O.pbe-rrkjus.UPF
> ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
> Ta 0.892500000 0.262300000 0.386500000
> Ta 0.107500000 0.737700000 0.613500000
> Ta 0.613500000 0.237700000 0.107500000
> Ta 0.386500000 0.762300000 0.892500000
> O 0.898000000 0.250000000 0.102000000
> O 0.102000000 0.750000000 0.898000000
> O 0.338000000 0.990000000 0.440000000
> O 0.662000000 0.010000000 0.560000000
> O 0.560000000 0.510000000 0.662000000
> O 0.440000000 0.490000000 0.338000000
> O 0.868000000 0.355000000 0.730000000
> O 0.132000000 0.645000000 0.270000000
> O 0.270000000 0.145000000 0.132000000
> O 0.730000000 0.855000000 0.868000000
> K_POINTS gamma
>
> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>
> Thank you for the help and your program.
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
> On Friday 31 August 2007 16:37, Tone Kokalj wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 15:20 +0700, Alexander Shaposhnikov wrote:
>>
>>> Compiled it (with ifort) and swaped, but the things become worse :)
>>> The distances are now on the order of magnitude more than should be.
>>>
>> I was too fast with the fix. Can you retry with this. Tone
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
>
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list