[Pw_forum] Re: Pw_forum digest, Vol 1 #1325 - 4 msgs
Srijan Kumar Saha
srijan.india at gmail.com
Mon Jan 29 17:39:40 CET 2007
Dear Malgorzata ,
It's very nice to recieve your quick reply.
Thank you very much my adorable friend.
>>>>>>>And always k_fit/(k_phonon + q_phonon) should be the integer
number.
So if I use 48 48 1 for k_fit
24 24 1 for k_phonon and
2/3 0.0 0.0 for a special single q point (it's not
automatic generated value)
Then I think it will be fine , Right???
OK let me try.
Regards,
Amit
On 1/29/07, Malgorzata Wierzbowska <wierzbom at ts.infn.it> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Srijan Kumar Saha wrote:
>
>
> > Respected Users,
> >
> > Would you like to tell me what automatic (like 48 48 1)
> > the dense k-point grid in the first scf calculations
> > (i.e. scf-fit). I should use
> > to get special q point
> >>
> >> 0.6666667 0.0 0.0
> >> as a the subsets of the scf-fit ????
> > Is there any definite rule except applying a trial and
> > error method like 4 4 1, 6 6 1, 9 9 1, 38 38 1 etc. etc. ????
> > Your kind help will be greatly appreciated.
> > Regards,
> > Amit
> >
>
> If q=(2/3,0.0,0.0) your k-mesh for phonons and k-fit mesh
> should be modulo 3. So (4 4 1) and (38 38 1) are for sure bad.
> Meshes (6 6 1) and (9 9 1) are too small, although they would
> not give the error if your rare k-mesh (k-mesh for phonons) were
> modulo 3.
> Actually, for this kind of calculations you should ask for
> 3 meshes: k_fit, k_phonon, q_phonon.
> And always k_fit/(k_phonon + q_phonon) should be the integer
> number.
>
> Gosia
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20070129/632a5fd4/attachment.htm
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list