[Pw_forum] about the ibrav=0
hyello25 Qgrui
hyello25 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 26 17:59:50 CEST 2007
hi,
* When I use ibrav=0 to calculate the force of Si, I encounter some
problems. Are there some thing wrong in my codes?*
&system
ibrav = 0,
nat = 2,
ntyp = 1,
ecutwfc = 50,
A = 5.39780000 ,
B = 5.39780000 ,
C = 5.39780000 ,
cosAB = 0.500000 ,
cosAC = 0.500000 ,
cosBC = 0.500000 ,
/
&electrons
mixing_beta = 0.7
conv_thr = 1.0d-7
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Si 28.086 Si.vbc.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
Si 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
Si 0.25000 0.25000 0.25000
CELL_PARAMETERS cubic
0.288675135 -0.500000000 0.816496581
0.288675135 0.500000000 0.816496581
-0.577350269 0.000000000 0.816496581
K_POINTS automatic
4 4 4 1 1 1
* The result is below, why does force exit in this situation?*
! total energy = -15.46091639 ryd
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000003 ryd
band energy sum = -2.48914635 ryd
one-electron contribution = -1.72655466 ryd
hartree contribution = 2.24142346 ryd
xc contribution = -4.02628209 ryd
ewald contribution = -11.94950310 ryd
convergence has been achieved
Forces acting on atoms (Ry/au):
* ** atom 1 type 1 force = 0.00314138 0.00000000 -
0.00856639
atom 2 type 1 force = -0.00314138 0.00000000 0.00856639*
Total force = 0.012904 Total SCF correction = 0.000110
entering subroutine stress ...
total stress (ryd/bohr**3) (kbar) P= -
86.51
-0.00058668 0.00000000 0.00000976 -86.30 0.00 1.44
0.00000000 -0.00058838 0.00000000 0.00 -86.55 0.00
0.00000976 0.00000000 -0.00058914 1.44 0.00 -86.67
*Another question :whether we need not ot set cosAB, cosAC, cosBC when we
use ibrav=0?*
thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20070426/1e3dc9dd/attachment.htm
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list