[Pw_forum] vc-relax
Eric Abel
etabel at hotmail.com
Mon Sep 11 21:16:16 CEST 2006
PWSCF Users
I am running the vc-relax calculation again, with more or less the same
parameters as
Guido (roma at srmp.saclay.cea.fr), but I am noticing (as I did with the first
time I tried tha calculation) that neither the force nor the stress is
changing from iteration to iteration. This makes me think that perhaps the
program reached a maximum number of iterations the first time I tried the
calculation and therefore there were not lattice or cell parameters to
report.
The relevant parts of my input file are the following:
calculation = 'vc-relax' ,
restart_mode = 'from_scratch' ,
outdir = './tmp/' ,
pseudo_dir = '/home/eric/espresso/pseudo/' ,
prefix = 'tiocl' ,
tstress = .true.,
tprnfor = .true.,
/
&SYSTEM
ibrav = 8,
celldm(1) = 7.1544654,
celldm(2) = .8877443,
celldm(3) = 2.1249340,
nat = 6,
ntyp = 3,
ecutwfc = 30.0 ,
ecutrho = 240 ,
occupations = 'smearing' ,
degauss = .02 ,
smearing = 'methfessel-paxton' ,
nspin = 1 ,
/
&ELECTRONS
conv_thr = 1.0e-10 ,
mixing_beta = 0.7 ,
diagonalization = 'david' ,
/
&IONS
/
&CELL
cell_dynamics = 'damp-w' ,
wmass = .01,
press = 0,
/
This is really the first problem I have encountered using PWSCF where things
didn't behave as they should. Could it be that I am using 2.1?
Eric
>Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] vc-relax
>Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:48:07 +0200
>
>On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 04:01 -0400, Eric Abel wrote:
> > Hi roma,
> >
> > Do you mind posting your input file...if you'd rather keep the material
> > composition under wraps, I understand...just omit the ATOMIC SPECIES
>card.
>
>No problem, I haven't discovered any miraculous material whatsoever,
>it's simply silicon dioxide ;-)
>Guido
>
>
>
>--
>Guido Roma <roma${at}cea.fr> -- CEA-Saclay - DEN/DMN/SRMP Bat.520/130
>Phone: [+33]-1-69085738 -- Fax: ...6867 -- Mobile: [+33]-6-20069085
>
><< ISi73__2.in >>
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list