[Pw_forum] Distance Constraint relaxation and SIC in QE 3.1.1 (FPMD)
Diep Quang Vinh
vdiep at ictp.it
Mon Sep 4 15:20:59 CEST 2006
Dear all,
I am using FPMD and my problems are:
1. I need include the Self-Interaction-Correction (SIC) in the calculation. Actually, I
did it in the version 3.0 and the results are good.
2. Now i want to do some constraint (distance) relaxations (with SIC correction). I
think i should change to version 3.1.1??
Here are my run:
If i use the version 3.1 of QE the code give the the following error:
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
from module setup : error # 1
Stress is not yet implemented with SIC
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
ERROR: 0031-250 task 0: Terminated
It seems to me that the code don't understand the SIC. But if I use the previous version
of QE like 3.0 I meet the following error. In this case the code don't understant the
constrain.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
from init_constraint : error # 1
constrain type not implemented
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
ERROR: 0031-250 task 0: Terminated
Both of them have the same input like the following:
-------------
&CONTROL
calculation = 'fpmd',
title = 'resconstructed and ee',
prefix='RECON-EE-CON'
ndr = 60,
ndw = 61,
restart_mode = 'restart'
nstep = 200
iprint = 20
isave = 20
tstress = .TRUE.,
tprnfor = .TRUE.,
dt = 4.d0
etot_conv_thr = 1.d-5,
pseudo_dir= '/sfs/sanfs/home/userictp/ictpcm01/UPF/'
/
&SYSTEM
ibrav= 14,
celldm(1) = 16.972000,
celldm(2) = 1.,
celldm(3) = 4.9733070,
celldm(4) = 0.0,
celldm(5) = 0.0,
celldm(6) = -0.5,
nat= 101,
ntyp= 4,
nspin = 2,
ecutwfc =80.0,
ecfixed = 68.0,
q2sigma = 8.0,
nbnd=145,
nelec=289,
nelup = 145.d0,
neldw = 144.d0,
sic = 'sic_mac',
sic_epsilon = 1.d0,
sic_alpha = 1.d0,
force_pairing = .TRUE.,
xc_type = 'BLYP',
/
&ELECTRONS
emass = 200.d0,
emass_cutoff = 2.5d0,
orthogonalization = 'ortho',
ortho_eps = 5.d-8,
ortho_max = 28,
electron_dynamics = 'damp'
electron_damping=0.1d0
electron_velocities = 'default'
electron_temperature = 'not_controlled',
/
&IONS
ion_dynamics = 'sd'
!on_damping=0.2d0
ion_velocities='zero'
ion_positions='default'
!ion_temperature='nose'
!fnosep=30.d0
!tempw=150.d0
ion_radius(1) = 0.8d0,
ion_radius(2) = 0.8d0,
ion_radius(3) = 0.8d0,
ion_radius(4) = 0.8d0,
sic_rloc = 1.d0,
/
&CELL
cell_dynamics = 'none',
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Cl 35.4d0 Cl.blyp-mt.UPF
O 16.0d0 O.blyp-mt.UPF
C 12.0d0 C.blyp-mt.UPF
H 1.0d0 H.blyp-mt.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS (bohr)
Cl 2.61430 7.78152 -34.88870 1 1 1 1
Cl 3.35627 4.05314 -31.36570 1 1 1 1
Cl 6.74509 3.51397 -35.12750 1 1 1 1
Cl 7.44480 8.10866 -32.96470 1 1 1 1
C 5.03399 5.90311 -33.57770 1 1 1 1
H 15.45910 -3.29036 -22.36830 1 1 1 1
...................
CONSTRAINTS
1
'distance' 1 5
--------------
If you ommit the these last lines(CONSTRAINTS), The version 3.0 work very well (no error
at all) but not the version 3.1.1.
So it seems to me that the version 3.1.1 don't incoporate the SIC correction ? Am i right?
Thank you very much
Best regards.
Vinh
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list