[Pw_forum] SOC
Andrea Dal Corso
dalcorso at sissa.it
Tue May 16 09:32:13 CEST 2006
On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 14:54 -0500, Bhagawan Sahu wrote:
> Andrea,
>
> In the relativistic PP generation, How the the orbitals, to be pseudozied
> , are filled in in case of Pt?
>
> I am trying to generate the Bi PP using the example of Pt given with the
> distribution.
>
> for example, in pt.in
>
> 7
> 5D 3 2 4.00 0.00 2.10 2.40 1.50
> 5D 3 2 0.00 -0.20 2.10 2.40 1.50
> 5D 3 2 4.00 0.00 2.10 2.40 2.50
> 5D 3 2 0.00 -0.20 2.10 2.40 2.50
> 6P 2 1 0.00 -0.00 3.30 3.30 0.50
> 6P 2 1 0.00 -0.00 3.40 3.40 1.50
> 6S 1 0 2.00 0.00 2.60 2.60 0.50
>
> 6s is local so is placed at the end.
>
> four 5d states---> for j=3/2, there are 4 states so max occupation in
> these states is 4.0 (for up-spin) so down-spin occupation is zero.
> These counts for first two 5d orbitals (one for up and one for down,
> j=3/2).
There are not up or down states. The states are eigenfunctions of J^2
and J_z (total angular momentum). They are not eigenfunctions of the
spin operator. When j=3/2, j_z can be -3/2, -1/2, 1/2, -3/2 so there are
four states that can contain a maximum of 4 electrons. The other 4
electrons go in j=5/2 states.
>
> for j=5/2 there are 6 states, so maximum occupation in these states is 6.0
> but we have 4 remaining electrons so next two 5d states are for j=5/2
> (one up and one down j=5/2).
>
> What I do not understand is the 6P states. for l=1 we have j=1/2 or 3/2
>
> for j=1/2, we have two states with maximum occupation 2.0
> for j=3/2, we have four states with maxmum occupation 4.0
>
> For Bi, there are 3 p-electrons so
> the p config is
>
> 6P 2 1 2.00 -0.00 3.30 3.30 0.50
> 6P 2 1 0.00 -0.00 3.40 3.40 0.50
> 6P 2 1 1.00 -0.00 3.30 3.30 1.50
> 6P 2 1 0.00 -0.00 3.40 3.40 1.50
>
I think here the configuration is OK. However in US there are two states
for each channel (these are not spin-up and spin-down but two different
energies). Here you set all energies to 0.00 (that means: take the
eigenvalue) and this is not correct. The second energy should be
different from zero:
6P 2 1 2.00 -0.00 3.30 3.30 0.50
6P 2 1 0.00 Energy 3.40 3.40 0.50
6P 2 1 1.00 -0.00 3.30 3.30 1.50
6P 2 1 0.00 Energy 3.40 3.40 1.50
Which energy I do not know. It depends on the atom and is a matter of
cooking. Often an energy slightly higher than the eigenvalue works. In
other cases you need to look at the logarithmic derivative to guess a
reasonable value.
> Is this true?
>
> the first two are for j=1/2 and last two are for j=3/2
>
> Also, since pseudotype =3 (ultrasoft), are the entries for rcut(meant for
> norm conserving PP's) in Pt.in meaningful? I guess they are ignored in the
> ultrasoft generation.
>
They are not ignored. The ultrasoft pseudization is done starting from
the norm conserving wavefunctions.
> Sahu
>
>
> four 5d states--> why there are four of these?
>
>
two values of j and two energies for each j.
>
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Andrea Dal Corso wrote:
>
> > Yes the SO term is only in the pseudo-potential but valence states
> > interact with a fully relativistic pseudo-potential at each scf cycle.
> > We make an approximation because we neglect the spin-orbit coupling
> > outside the core radius where however the effect is expected to be
> > small.
> >
> > Andrea
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 12:43 -0500, Bhagawan Sahu wrote:
> > > Dear pwscf users,
> > >
> > > Is it true that
> > >
> > > the bulk spin-orbit coupling (SOC) calculation is done using a
> > > relativistic
> > > PP for the atom/ion (RRKJ scheme and Andrea Dal Carso's PRB paper) and the
> > > SOC effect is not included self-consistently on the valence states during
> > > the scf cycle?
> > >
> > > Sahu
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pw_forum mailing list
> > > Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> > > http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
--
Andrea Dal Corso Tel. 0039-040-3787428
SISSA, Via Beirut 2/4 Fax. 0039-040-3787528
34014 Trieste (Italy) e-mail: dalcorso at sissa.it
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list