[Pw_forum] phonon calc. for fcc at X

e kb eminekb at yahoo.com
Mon Dec 11 00:05:37 CET 2006


 
  Dear Stefano,
  Thank you, I will study the relevant part for pert. potential., do the suggested tests and modifications,
  and send the result back to close the case.
  But a fast point that I wanted to note that is,
  InN turns out to be a metal according to my calculations,
  without several corrections used, like GW or SIC.
  That was the reason of the k-mesh.
  Thank you for your help.
  
Emine Kucukbenli
  
Stefano de Gironcoli <degironc at sissa.it> wrote:
  
If I remember correctly there used to be a term in the phonon 
calculation in which the perturbing potential was written as DeltaV(r) = 
exp(+iqr)*\DeltaVperiodic(r) and \DeltaVperiodic was expanded up to
the charge density cutoff ... this term was therefore slightly different
for two q wavevectors that would otherwise be equivalent. This never
gave any noticeable difference in real calculations and I would be 
surprised if this would be the cause of your results but a way to check
this is to increase the charge density cutoff and see what happens as
in this case the problem should disappear when the potential description
become complete.



More information about the Pw_forum mailing list