[Pw_forum] Re: how to input crystal structure of Amm2 SrTiO3
Stefano Baroni
baroni at sissa.it
Wed Apr 19 09:19:27 CEST 2006
On Apr 19, 2006, at 3:35 AM, 针叶 朱 wrote:
> Dear stefano Baroni:
> i want to caculate the properties of SrTiO3 under tensile strain. i
> have known the crystal structure of SrTiO3 under tensile strain is
> Amm2 space group, and atomic cartesian cooridinate : Sr(0,0,0),Ti
> ((0.5+Δx,0,0.5),O1(0.5+Δx,0,0) O2(0.25+Δx,0.25+Δy,0.5).there is
> several question about atomic question.
> first, in ATOMIC_POSITION{alat}, is atomic cooridinates along
> cartesian cooridinate?
YES atomic coordinates are cartesian for every option of the
ATOMIC_POSITION control card, but "crystal"
> second in ATOMIC_POSITION{crystal}, is atomic cooridinates along
> crystal axis of primitive unit cell cooridinate?for hobr and
> angstrom,the case is same to the alat?
I do not quite understand the question, in any case the "crystal"
atomic coordinates are defined by the convention:
x(:) = \sum_j AT(:,j)*c(j),
where x(:) are the atomic (cartesian) coordinates, and AT(:,1), AT(:,
2), AT(:,3) are the the basis vectors of the Bravais lattice with
their own units (you usually specify AT giving "ibrav" and "celldm
(:)", the latter in Bohr radii). A list of conventional basis vectors
used by PWscf (as well as much other useful information) is found in
the documentation files distributed with the code (INPUT_PW, in the
present case). Beware, though, that you hardly need to pass atomic
positions in crystal units. It is usually far easier to pass them in
cartesian coordinates.
> from symmestry, The SrTiO3 cartesian cooridinate:
> Sr 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
> Ti 0.500000 0.000000 0.500000
> O 0.500000 0.000000 0.000000
> O 0.250000 -0.250000 0.000000
> O 0.750000 -0.250000 0.500000
> O 0.750000 -0.250000 0.000000
> O 0.250000 -0.250000 0.500000
> but i found that the ion position in still after optimization.
> please tell me how to input structure of AMM2 SrTiO3?
This is a more subtle question which I would invite you to think
about carefully by yourself.
Suppose you want to find the (stable) equilibrium position of a
particle in a double potential well, say V(x)=(x^2-1)^2, and that you
start your numerical search from x=0. The force acting on the
particle at this position is zero by symmetry. So, any algorithm
aiming at finding the zeroes of the force would keep the particle
fixed at x=0. Does this imply that this is an equilibrim position?
Does this imply that this a _stable_ equilibrium position? How would
you use an algorithm which finds the zeroes of the force to find a
stable equilibrium configuration in this case? What has this all to
do with you problem?
Please, give a thought at these questions and revert to us with or
without a solution to your problem.
Stefano B.
> There is my inputfile of
> SrTIO3
> &CONTROL
> title='st'
> calculation='relax'
> restart_mode = 'from_scratch' ,
> outdir = 'tmp' ,
> pseudo_dir = '/home/zzy/pwscf/pseudo/' ,
> prefix = 'pst' ,
> forc_conv_thr=1.0D-4
> tstress = .true. ,
> tprnfor = .true. ,
> /
> &SYSTEM
> ibrav=9,
> celldm(1)=7.5,
> celldm(2)=1
> celldm(3)=0.955
> nat=7,
> ntyp=3,
> ecutwfc=50,
> ecutrho=450
> /
> &ELECTRONS
> conv_thr=1.0d-6
> /
> &IONS
> ion_dynamics = 'bfgs' ,
> /
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
> Sr 87.62000 038-Sr-ca-sp-vgrp.uspp.UPF
> Ti 47.88000 022-Ti-ca-sp-vgrp.uspp.UPF
> O 15.99960 008-O-ca--vgrp.uspp.UPF
> ATOMIC_POSITIONS {crystal}
> Sr 0 0 0 0 0 0
> Ti 0.5 0 0.5 1 0 0
> O 0.5 0 0 1 0 0
> O 0.25 -0.25 0.0 1 1 0
> O 0.75 -0.25 0.5 1 1 0
> O 0.25 -0.25 0.5 1 1 0
> O 0.75 -0.25 0 1 1 0
> K_POINTS {automatic}
> 6 6 6 1 1 1
>
> Regards
>
> zhuzhenye
> __________________________________________________
> 赶快注册雅虎超大容量免费邮箱?
> http://cn.mail.yahoo.com
---
Stefano Baroni - SISSA & DEMOCRITOS National Simulation Center -
Trieste
[+39] 040 3787 406 (tel) -528 (fax) / stefanobaroni (skype)
Please, if possible, don't send me MS Word or PowerPoint attachments
Why? See: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20060419/c2cc1698/attachment.htm
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list