[Pw_forum] PBE usoft Mg ?
Stefano Baroni
baroni at sissa.it
Tue Apr 4 07:39:01 CEST 2006
Probably I should not suggest this, but I am pretty sure that the PBE
PP will not differ much from PW91. So, if you are in a hurry, while
you learn how to generate a proper pw91 PP, you could just fake the
PBE PP file, by just changing the functional label and use it as if
it was pw91 ... Once you have generate a new PP, let us know ... Take
care - SB
On Apr 3, 2006, at 7:38 PM, H.S.Domingos wrote:
> Yes, so I will have to generate an Mg USP with PBE instead of Pw91.
> Does anyone have one already made and tested for MgO for example ?
>
> Thank you again and sorry I am new to PWSCF.
>
> Helder
>
>
> ======================================================================
> =
> | Dr. Helder S.
> Domingos |
> |
> |
> | INESC Microsyst & Nanotechnol, Lisbon, P-1000
> Portugal |
> |
> and |
> | R&D unit for Molecular Chemical
> Physics |
> | Chemistry Department, University of
> Coimbra |
> ======================================================================
> =
>
>
> On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Stefano Baroni wrote:
>
>> just a guess: the two pp's seem to have been generated using
>> different functionals (O=>pbe, Mg=>pw91), which is inconsistent.
>> S.
>>
>> On Apr 3, 2006, at 7:06 PM, H.S.Domingos wrote:
>>
>>> I have a problem that if I use
>>> O 15.9994 O.pbe-rrkjus.UPF
>>> Mg 24.3050 Mg.pw91-np-van.UPF
>>> I get
>>> from readpp : error # 2
>>> inconsistent DFT read
>>> what is it ?
>>> Sorry !
>>> Helder
>>> ====================================================================
>>> ===
>>> | Dr. Helder S.
>>> Domingos |
>>> |
>>> |
>>> | INESC Microsyst & Nanotechnol, Lisbon, P-1000
>>> Portugal |
>>> |
>>> and
>>> |
>>> | R&D unit for Molecular Chemical
>>> Physics |
>>> | Chemistry Department, University of
>>> Coimbra |
>>> ====================================================================
>>> ===
>>> On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Paolo Giannozzi wrote:
>>>> On Monday 03 April 2006 15:06, H.S.Domingos wrote:
>>>>> I would like to ask if anyone has used a PBE usoft potential for
>>>>> Magnesium with PWSCF ?
>>>>> I have tried to find one and could not. Are there any
>>>>> impediments in
>>>>> the generation of a potential of this type for Mg ?
>>>> there are no impediments, but it is not a big deal, if you need a
>>>> 2-electron PP: Mg is not that hard. An ultrasoft PP may be needed
>>>> only if for some reason you need semicore electrons in Mg.
>>>> Paolo
>>>> --
>>>> Paolo Giannozzi e-mail: giannozz at nest.sns.it
>>>> Scuola Normale Superiore Phone: +39/050-509876, Fax:-563513
>>>> Piazza dei Cavalieri 7 I-56126 Pisa, Italy
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pw_forum mailing list
>>>> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
>>>> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pw_forum mailing list
>>> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
>>> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>>
>> ---
>> Stefano Baroni - SISSA & DEMOCRITOS National Simulation Center -
>> Trieste
>> [+39] 040 3787 406 (tel) -528 (fax) / stefanobaroni (skype)
>>
>> Please, if possible, don't send me MS Word or PowerPoint attachments
>> Why? See: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
---
Stefano Baroni - SISSA & DEMOCRITOS National Simulation Center -
Trieste
[+39] 040 3787 406 (tel) -528 (fax) / stefanobaroni (skype)
Please, if possible, don't send me MS Word or PowerPoint attachments
Why? See: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20060404/db0ffd0e/attachment.htm
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list