[Pw_forum] about AFM scf calculation
Stefano de Gironcoli
degironc at sissa.it
Mon Apr 4 09:02:43 CEST 2005
Hi,
you need to specify two DIFFERENT labels for the two Fe species
otherwise the code will treat them in the same way.
If you plan to perform LDA+U calculations please read CAREFULLY the
README file of example 25 and the papers quoted therein.
best regards,
Stefano de Gironcoli
whzhang wrote:
>hello,everybody:
>I'd like to get a AFM insulator ground state of FeO,but I got a FM metalic state from the first iteration to the last.
>And I have tested in other software and get a AFM insulator ground state. I don't know how to do now ...
>
>
>Below is my input file:
>and the occupations='fixed' make a mistake
>
>
>&CONTROL
> title = 'feo' ,
> calculation = 'scf' ,
> restart_mode = 'from_scratch' ,
> outdir = '/*/' ,
> pseudo_dir = '/*/' ,
> prefix = 'feo' ,
> tstress = .false. ,
> tprnfor = .false. ,
> tefield = .false. ,
>/
>&SYSTEM
> ibrav = 5,
> A = 5.27710 ,
> B = 5.27710 ,
> C = 5.27710 ,
> cosAB = 0.8341 ,
> cosAC = 0.8341 ,
> cosBC = 0.8341 ,
> nat = 4,
> ntyp = 3,
> ecutwfc = 25 ,
> ecutrho = 100 ,
> nosym = .false. ,
> occupations = 'smearing' ,
> degauss = 0.005 ,
> smearing = 'gaussian' ,
> nspin = 2 ,
> starting_magnetization(1) = 1,
> starting_magnetization(2) = -1,
> starting_magnetization(3) = 0,
> lda_plus_u = .true. ,
> Hubbard_U(1) = 5.1,
> Hubbard_U(2) = 5.1,
> Hubbard_alpha(1) = 0.95,
> Hubbard_alpha(2) = 0.95,
> /
> &ELECTRONS
> electron_maxstep = 100,
> conv_thr = 1D-6 ,
> mixing_mode = 'plain' ,
> mixing_beta = 0.7 ,
> mixing_ndim = 8,
> mixing_fixed_ns = 20,
> /
>ATOMIC_SPECIES
> Fe 55.84500 FeUSPBE.RRKJ3.UPF
> Fe 55.84500 FeUSPBE.RRKJ3.UPF
> O 15.99940 O.PBE.US.RRKJ3.UPF
>ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
> Fe 0.250000000 0.250000000 0.250000000 0 0 0
> Fe -0.250000000 -0.250000000 -0.250000000 0 0 0
> O 0.500000000 0.500000000 0.500000000 0 0 0
> O 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000 0 0 0
>K_POINTS automatic
> 3 3 3 1 1 1
>
>
>
>best reagards
>
>
> whzhang
> whzhang at ustc.edu
> 2002-04-02
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list