[Pw_forum] compiling pw.1.2.0 using mpich and ifc for linux cluster
Jonathan Breeze
breezejd at lsbu.ac.uk
Tue Nov 18 17:34:36 CET 2003
Hello everybody,
I have a little linux cluster of 8 nodes and have been trying to compile
a parallel version of pw.1.2.0 for it using the intel compiler version 7.1.
I am using the MPICH library (version 1.2.5.2) which I compiled from
source using ifc7.1 to produce mpif90.
I ran the simple pi3f90 fortran test example using 'mpirun -np 8 a.out'
and it worked fine, all nodes happy and running their own process. I
ran further tests which showed that processes where running on nodes and
communicating properly.
Not so happy when I compiled a parallel pw.1.2.0. :(
I had managed to compile the serial version using blas, lapack and atlas
libraries. It produces the correct results and functions very well.
I compiled a parallel version, which compiled without any errors (I used
the -DPARA -D__MPI CPP flags and set the compiler to mpif90). When I
run the parallel pw.x using mpirun -np 4 pw.x I get the following message:
mpirun -np 4 bin/pw.x
** Address Error **
End of diagnostics
Oh dear! The program didn't get very far.
The make.sys file is included here. Can any kind soul offer some
assistance ?? Many thanks.
OSHOME=/home/jonathan/pw.1.2.0p
CPPFLAGS = -I$(OSHOME)/include/ -DPC -DPARA -D__MPI -DFFTW \
-D"FFTWND_F77_ONE=fftwnd_f77_one_" \
-D"FFTW3D_F77_CREATE_PLAN=fftw3d_f77_create_plan_" \
-D"FFTW_F77=fftw_f77_" \
-D"FFTW_F77_CREATE_PLAN=fftw_f77_create_plan_"
F90 = mpif90
FFLAGS =-Vaxlib -W0
F90FLAGS= $(FFLAGS) -fpp $(CPPFLAGS)
MODULEFLAG= -nomodule -I $(OSHOME)/Modules -I$(OSHOME)/PW -I$(OSHOME)/PH
LIBS = -L/usr/local/lib -lfftw -L/home/jonathan/libs -llapack -lf77blas
-lcblas -latlas \
-L/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.2.2/ -lg2c
#
LD=$(F90)
LFLAGS = -Vaxlib $(LIBS)
#
# ar:
#
AR = ar
ARFLAGS = ruv
--
Jonathan Breeze
Research Fellow
Centre for Physical Electronics and Materials
London South Bank University
103 Borough Road
London
SE1 0AA
Tel: +44(0)20 7815 7582
Fax: +44(0)20 7815 7599
More information about the Pw_forum
mailing list